Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq. Show all posts

5/25/2012

ASSESSING THE BABY BOOMER LEGACY

My generation, the baby boomers, are arguably the most celebrated generation in American history. Time Magazine named us Person of the Year in 1966. As youths we fostered peace, love and understanding principally by helping to end the Vietnam War, and we played an influential role in the civil rights and environmental movements. But, did we live up to the high ideals we preached in the four decades since then?

As young people, we vehemently criticized all institutions of power from our parents to government. The lyrics of Bob Dylan’s The Times They Are a-Changin’ characterized what appeared to be the pervasive sentiment of the baby boomers at the time when he said the “old road” of our “mothers and fathers” is “rapidly agin.”

But, did we really abandon the “old road” of our parents, and take a “new one”?  Now that we have occupied the seats of power in government, business, academia, and media, and are transitioning to our golden years, it’s the ideal time to evaluate ourselves by the same standards we judged our parents.

The centerpiece of our legacy to date has to be the peace movement. However, although the Vietnam War was brought to an end, the U.S. has essentially remained in international conflicts ever since including Beirut, Grenada, Panama, the Gulf War, Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Iraq. And, if truth be told, we had an ulterior motive in our protests of the Vietnam War. Our necks were in the noose since the military draft was still in full effect and any one of us could suddenly find ourselves fighting an unpopular war in the jungles of Southeast Asia. Once the draft ended, war suddenly became more palatable and collectively the baby boomers fell silent in the face of war ever since.

While American deaths have plummeted since Vietnam largely due to weak adversaries, smart weapons, and quicker and better battlefield medical attention; civilian mortality rates are disturbingly high. We were outraged by events that unfolded in My Lai, yet civilian deaths in Iraq alone are estimated to be well over 100,000 since 2003, even by U.S. government measurements. The folly and futility of the Vietnam War are now being replayed simultaneously in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The record of racial equality in America is also a bit disappointing. Although the 1960’s brought about desegregation, the plight of people of color has not improved much in the decades that followed. The gap between rich and poor has only grown more pronounced, and the digital divide makes the disadvantaged ever more challenged.

Our incarceration rate is the highest in the world. In 2005, for the first time in our history, more than one in 100 Americans was behind bars with a disproportionate amount being people of color. According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics non-Hispanic blacks accounted for 39.4% of the total prison and jail population in 2009, even though they represented only 13.6% of the U.S. population according to the 2010 census. One in nine black men between the ages of 20 and 34 are behind bars.

Today we teeter on repealing or amending much of the environmental legislation of the past four decades at the expense of the environment and to the benefit of big business. We have shunned global efforts that deal with atmospheric threats refusing to support the Convention on Biodiversity treaty at the Earth Summit in 1992 and the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. 193 nations ratified the former and the U.S. remains the only signatory out of 192 nations not to have ratified the latter.

All-in-all we have behaved no differently than our parents. Our lofty aspirations and criticism of our parents’ generation were hypocritical in light of what we accomplished. War is pervasive as ever, the plight of people of color is still alarming, and we shun world and scientific opinion in the face of the greatest environmental threats mankind ever confronted. Some of the problems that remain as we fade into our senior years may not be entirely of our doing, but much of it is. Given that we preached such high ideals and lambasted our parents in the process, I think all of us baby boomers owe our parents an apology, not because our principles were wrong, but because we were wrong about ourselves.

1/08/2006

FUTILITY OF AMERICAN METHODS OF WARFARE


After a stalemate in the Korean War and a humiliating defeat in Vietnam the U.S. has been very selective in who it invades concentrating exclusively on very weak countries who have few if any allies. This is clearly evident when you look at our military interventions since Vietnam: Dominican Republic, 1965; Lebanon,1982–84; Grenada, 1983; Libya, 1986; Panama, 1989; Iraq, 1990-91; Somalia, 1992-94; Bosnia, 1995; Kosovo, 1999; Afghanistan, 2001 to present; and Iraq, 2003 to present. All these countries combined could not even pose a formidable threat to the U.S. Although overwhelmingly one-sided we are still careful not to commit massive amounts of ground troops on the battlefront. Instead, we unleash high-tech weaponry from a safe distance far beyond the enemy’s ability to strike back. The opposing side suffers massive casualties, many of which are civilians, while we suffer relatively few. The American public supports these conflicts so long as our casualties are kept to a minimum. There is little or no consideration of the death and destruction inflicted on the other side. We seem to measure human life on different scales. American lives are far more valuable than the ones we kill - even if they are civilians and not our enemies.

Many Americans are still under the naive impression that high-tech weaponry somehow distinguishes good people from bad, innocent civilians from combatants. The number of CIVILIAN casualties in Iraq clearly tells a different story. Estimates through 2005 vary considerably. President Bush’s own number which you have to believe is conservative at best is 30,000. Other estimates are well over 100,000! Settling on a universally accepted number is irrelevant. Even if you take Bush’s estimate, the figure is unacceptable. This is innocent human life we are talking about.

Ironically, this strategy of warfare rarely if ever culminates in complete victory. It stands to reason that we cannot expect to win the hearts and minds of a nation’s people if our actions disproportionately harm innocent civilians. Our methods are seen as barbaric, indiscriminate, and cowardly; and they are.

When you also consider that in the last 50 years we have never affected a major positive outcome in the Middle East from our meddling or incursions, why do we expect anything good to come from Iraq? Why did we ever? It’s already clear that the war is becoming very unpopular here at home and that we inevitably will leave Iraq in turmoil, while also managing to alienate much of the global community.

Our record in the Middle-East illustrates that we do not understand the region very well. Our policy and vision repeatedly fail. We support the Shah of Iran whose repressive regime gives rise to the Islamic Fundamentalist movement. Suddenly, America is held hostage. We tilt our support toward Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War and Iraq later invades Kuwait. We back the Afghan rebels fighting the Soviets and we get the Taliban and Al Qaeda. It’s clear that when we meddle in the affairs of Persian states we are unable to effectively predict the outcome.

To further our current interests in the Middle East, we now ally ourselves with a dictator of an Islamic country, Pakistan, who was instrumental in the Taliban’s rise to power and a country who was testing nuclear weapons as recently as 1998 in the face of international condemnation. Pakistan’s cooperation with us could further polarize their sharply divided country and conceivably put nuclear weapons in the hands of Islamic extremists. It’s just more of the same - deal with the devil for swift, political gratification while ignoring the likelihood of negative, long-term repercussions.

Years from now after leaving Iraq, the people there will still be suffering, yet their adversity won’t even be on our radar. The public’s focus will be on other topics orchestrated by what politicians and the media deem important to their own selfish interests; and few Americans will be any wiser.

1/03/2006

US MANIPULATION OF IRAQI PRESS

When I read about the accusation that the Pentagon may be manipulating the Iraqi press, my first thought was the cycle continues: government lies, deceives and cheats; the public, primarily through the press, eventually uncovers it; no one in real power is inevitably punished; and the public naively feels the system works. Whether it’s the Bay of Pigs, cooked numbers in Vietnam, Watergate, Iran Contra, Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, or the torture of terrorist suspects, the story is always the same. Aside from a couple of low-level fall guys, none of the real masterminds are punished so there is no deterrent for history to keep repeating itself. When it comes to truth, justice and the American way we have no credibility in the global community. How can we expect to sell our brand of democracy and high-ideals to other nations if it is being marketed by a government of liars? Democracy will never be effectively exported from our shores until we begin to hold those individuals who perpetrate such crimes or low morality accountable for their actions and punish them regardless of rank in government, business or the military. The other option of course is to suppress the American press so these stories never see the light of day.