Bad chemistry western-style

A relatively new friend asked what I was struggling to write for days.  I was reluctant to answer given the volatility of the Israel - Hamas conflict, but she pressed a bit.  I figured what the hell and told her.  We proceeded to share our views.  She talked about the Jewish perspective as she saw it and I shared what I learned from my research.  At times, I felt the conversation teetering on the edge of a heated argument, but we never fell into that abyss.  

I was quite uplifted that a Gentile and Jew who barely knew each other were able to do this at such a divisive time.  We had somewhat opposing views, yet through respect, tolerance, and open-minds, we both came away with more insight on the subject.  Why can’t the warring parties and their supporters find the wisdom, strength and courage to do the same?

I asked her if she thought partitioning part of Germany for a Jewish state after WWII would have been a more just solution rather than taking land from the Arabs who had nothing to do with the Holocaust?  Her answer was simple, yet it redirected my thinking. She said Europe would be the last place they’d want to settle after centuries of European persecution and the Holocaust.

At that moment I understood that the current conflict in the Middle East started with a  terrorized diaspora fleeing Europe to a place people often go when things are bleak - they go home.  I’m not suggesting that Zionism’s two-thousand year old claim to the land is valid.  If it was then the entire world map would have to be redrawn, but the land is certainly a historically spiritual place for both Arabs and Jews.  Over time an interesting paradox emerged with one persecuted people feeling the need to persecute another group in order to survive.

The Palestinians had their land occupied by the British after WWI.  Three decades later after WWII, the United Nations divided the land in two, one portion retained by the Palestinians, the other for the new state of Israel founded in 1948.  A short war with the Arabs ensued with a decisive Israeli victory which precipitated the fleeing and expulsion of nearly a million Palestinians from their land.  One diaspora creating another.

I suspect the motives of the West to endorse the creation of Israel were due, in part, to guilt about looking the other way for nine years while Jews were exterminated.  Major U.S. corporations continued to trade with Nazi Germany during this period until Pearl Harbor.  IBM’s German subsidiary, for instance, supplied the Nazi’s with Hollerith Tabulating Machines, a precursor to the modern computer, which facilitated the transport of Jews to concentration camps and the distribution of slave labor.

How would we as Americans feel if a far greater power occupied our land then gave a portion of it to another group of people?  We’d be enraged and hellbent on removing the occupiers.  So given all this we can find ample reasons to empathize with both sides and that’s what we all need to do.

The inescapable reality, however, is that Israel has built a formidable economic and military powerhouse in just 75 years, albeit with massive U.S. support not shared with the Palestinians.  They are not going away.  

You could say the Jews fleeing Europe essentially got what they wanted except, that is, for peace. And the road to peace is not through genocide.  It’s not though the hugely disproportionate assault on innocent civilians and herding them into concentrated  areas.  Even if Hamas is crushed, another group will rise in its place.  If Israel occupies  Gaza, they will move elsewhere.  Military might cannot annihilate a cause and it cannot suppress ideas.  

We may be past the viability of Jews and Palestinians living peacefully together as one nation, but I fervently believe a two-state solution will work; it must work, but that can’t happen without the West jettisoning their anti-Arab biases and embracing and supporting both nations equally.

Both parties need to come to the peace table with hope and a genuine willingness to listen to each other free of distrust, hatred, and anger.  That means no preconditions by either party or the West except the cessation of both the fighting and the building of new settlements.

The U.S.’s wish that the Palestinian Authority (PA) govern Gaza is not the way to start peace negotiations.  Let’s not forget Hamas was democratically elected, the PA was not.  Regardless of the West’s label of Hamas as terrorists, they have proven to be an effective and popular steward managing to keep Gaza functioning amidst the oppressive, 16 year blockade, while the PA has proven to be corrupt, weak, and unable to stop the unrelenting construction of settlements on Palestinian land in East Jerusalem.  Israel and the U.S. cannot champion democracy and then feel they have the right to veto the results and install a weak leader.  They cannot say come to the peace table, but we’ll pick your representatives.  

Much of what ails us in the world today or has ailed us in the past is due to Western governments, principally Great Britain and the United States, arbitrarily dividing foreign lands which they have colonized or occupied with no consideration of national sovereignty or respect for the demographics of the populations affected by it.  Examples of such partitioning are India and Pakistan, North and South Korea, North and South Vietnam, and, of course, Palestine; all creating bad chemistry among the inhabitants, all hotbeds that have generated astronomical revenues for the West who often supply weapons to both sides.

Another impediment to peace is the frequent misconception that Hamas is inflexible and hellbent on exterminating the Jews as expressed 35 years ago in their Charter of 1988.  Rarely is it mentioned that they have long since softened their political rhetoric and revised their Charter in 2017 which is far less incendiary and shows just the kind of flexibility to start a healthy dialogue.  Article 20 states “...without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity and without relinquishing any Palestinian rights, Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state...along the lines of the 4th of June 1967...to be a formula of national consensus.”

Certainly the status quo in Israel hasn’t worked for 75 years.  Advancements in weapons technology offer the illusion of safety, but the reality is that technology moves forward on both sides of the fence.  Weapons, both chemical and conventional, get smaller, more lethal, and easier to conceal.  The only thing that changes as a consequence is the increasing amount of innocent citizens who die on both sides.